0 views
Lorry (small boobs) & Maya (big boobs) = FRIENDS with benefits, y.o.
Location:
Room subject:
To Start live! video press there
Live Live Sex Chat rooms Lorry (small boobs) & Maya (big boobs) = FRIENDS with benefits
Date: October 23, 2022
Tubes can regenerate. Have you tested recently?
He is NOT yours. He never will be. You're not going to get back what you had with him because:
A. He will no longer be alone with you (right so) B. He and Shay won't trust you around him C. Things that seemed innocent to him at the time won't be now D. you will have had, for all this time, a little fantasy going on in your head of what if, and that bubble has burst.
What did you expect to happen? Clearly you expected a better outcome than this, which is immediately disrespectful to Shay and to their marriage. They will feel like you misrepresented yourself to stay close to him, and you probably did.
What can you do? If you're determined to stay friends, and only friends, agree to their terms and work with everything inside you to get over him and be a good friend to both.
But if you can't, or don't want to, do that – cut ties. It will hurt, but you're the one who's spent years on the outside of the marriage with feelings that would affect it.
Unrequited love sucks, but it's not an excuse to do dirty on friends.
If the law was so simple you could just Google the gov website, we wouldn’t need lawyers…
You also have to take into account other laws that overlap etc
And well as historic precedents etc
All of which is used in the decision making process.
Absolutely none of us here, have a license to practise law in the UK, or are criminal law Barristers… so no one should be talking in absolutes, or saying “I think it’ll be ok” because you’re giving him advice/ an opinion, and it’s unwarranted in this situation.
In reality, almost every legal question is answered with “it depends” because the law is intentionally so confusing and contradictory and convoluted that someone like OP can’t just turn up to court and represent himself and win etc
So absolutely, it could be argued as self defence. But it could absolutely be argued in the other instance, especially if he blacked out and so wasn’t reasonable because he kept going after the danger had ceased.
I’ll give an easy example
I think we’d all agree it’s reasonable that if you broke into my kitchen with a machete while I was cooking dinner, and I hit you with a frying pan and knocked you out, then that’s fair enough.
But… if I went into a black out rage and kept hitting you… well I’m not longer defending myself… I’m just attacking you…
And that’s no longer deemed “reasonable” to most people
Likewise, I think it’s absolutely reasonable to think that, if one guy ran away, this guy probably wants to as well.
Which means you and your gf aren’t in danger…
So you’re not defending yourself or her from danger….
This is not my opinion…
I’m just highlight a way in which a lawyer could play it out so that it sounds less like self defence
And insecure as well. She did nothing wrong.