It’s a study of 80,000 children in a stable educated country. Biology hasn’t changed between now and 1932.
Your first article claiming to debunk the study says they didn’t find male variability in other species and specifically states “no humans were studied” lol did you even read it?
Your second source is another article about the pay gap with some IQ talk sprinkled in. I’m actually not sure what you are trying to prove with it. Maybe that there are social factors at play? Can’t argue that but that’s also hot to measure
You’d have a better time showing me a study not an article of a comparable population size being tested for IQ. You can try clicking the references in your articles and reading through the referenced studies yourself
It’s a study of 80,000 children in a stable educated country. Biology hasn’t changed between now and 1932.
Your first article claiming to debunk the study says they didn’t find male variability in other species and specifically states “no humans were studied” lol did you even read it?
Your second source is another article about the pay gap with some IQ talk sprinkled in. I’m actually not sure what you are trying to prove with it. Maybe that there are social factors at play? Can’t argue that but that’s also hot to measure
You’d have a better time showing me a study not an article of a comparable population size being tested for IQ. You can try clicking the references in your articles and reading through the referenced studies yourself
Yea, you’re paranoid.
Your SO is not going to like everything you do. But their reaction to it tells you everything.